Investing in the future

Oh, Snap. AdBlock? Seriously?

If you like our website keep us running by whitelisting this site in your ad blocker. We’re serving quality, Megatrends’s related ads only.

The final quarter of 2018 was not good for equity markets. Investors have had to contend with rising US central bank interest rates, a sharp slowdown in eurozone business confidence, weaker Chinese growth and rising geopolitical concerns (including Brexit, Italian politics and the ongoing trade conflict between the US and China). This all proved an indigestible cocktail for investors. On the plus side, over the quarter as a whole government bonds at least lived up to their traditional role as the defensive part of a well balanced portfolio.

Exhibit 1: Asset class and style returns in local currency

Source: Barclays, Bloomberg, FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. DM Equities: MSCI World; REITs: FTSE NAREIT All REITs; Cmdty: Bloomberg UBS Commodity Index; Global Agg: Barclays Global Aggregate; Growth: MSCI World Growth; Value: MSCI World Value; Small cap: MSCI World Small Cap. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 December 2018.


The quarter’s volatility started with the Federal Reserve (Fed) chairman Jerome Powell’s comment that the US policy rate was still “a long way” from neutral, implying that the Fed wasn’t about to stop increasing interest rates any time soon. US government bond yields moved higher to price in a faster pace of rate rises, with the US 10-year Treasury yield briefly rising above 3.2%. Equity investors soon started to worry about the potentially faster-than- expected pace of rate rises and equities sold off through October.

There was a brief bounce in early November but when US 10-year yields rose above 3.2% for a second time, again equity markets took fright. From the second week of November, equities fell with US government bond prices rising in a classic risk-off trade, with investors selling equities and buying Treasuries.

Markets have started to worry that the US is late in its economic cycle. Tax cuts helped boost growth and corporate earnings in 2018 but investors are aware that the fiscal stimulus will fade beyond the first half of 2019. The midterm elections in early November were important in this regard, as the Republican Party might have backed further tax cuts to support growth through to the next presidential election had they maintained control of the House of Representatives. However, with the Democrats winning the House, the likelihood of further meaningful fiscal stimulus, prior to the next US election, is significantly reduced.

In November, Fed chairman Powell changed his tune slightly, although not the song, saying rates were “just below” the range of estimates for neutral. This shift was interpreted as dovish, so much so that by the December meeting markets had moved to price in a greater than 50% probability that US interest rates won’t rise beyond 2.5% in 2019. However, while the Fed did lower its guidance from three to two rate hikes next year after the December meeting, this was less dovish than markets had been expecting, particularly given Powell’s insistence that the plan to reduce the central bank’s balance sheet was essentially on autopilot.

Exhibit 2: World stock market returns in local currency

Source: FactSet, FTSE, MSCI, Standard & Poor’s, TOPIX, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 December 2018.


In Europe, business surveys have been weakening all year but this quarter moved closer towards the level that has historically been consistent with not just a slowdown in the pace of growth but an outright contraction. Political tensions likely contributed to a sharp fall in both the Italian and French business surveys. Germany appears to be slowing but still growing, at least for now.

Part of the reason for the slowdown in Europe has been a sharp decline in the manufacturing sector’s new export orders, which appears attributable – at least in part – to a slowdown in demand from China. But domestic political factors have also been a drag. The Italian government’s confrontation with the European Union over its budget led to higher borrowing costs in Italy over the course of 2018. The Italian government has since submitted a budget with a lower projected deficit, helping to bring borrowing costs back down. Meanwhile in France, protests surrounding the cost of petrol led to widespread unrest in key cities and this appears to have significantly dented business confidence.

President Macron has since announced fuel duty cuts and other stimulus measures to ease the tensions. Despite the slowdown in growth, the European Central Bank ended its quantitative easing programme in December, noting the broad-based nature of the firming in wage growth across the region.


In the UK, wage growth has also been accelerating, rising at the fastest pace since the financial crisis. On the other hand, the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the Brexit negotiations has weighed on business and consumer confidence. House prices, and particularly the number of transactions, are also being affected by the uncertainty. Against this backdrop the Bank of England maintained rates at 0.75%. The political theatre around Brexit will inevitably reach its most dramatic point in this final act. In our view, the ability of the UK parliament to revoke Article 50, combined with the fact that a no-deal Brexit would lead to a hard border in Ireland and significant repercussions for the UK economy, means a no-deal scenario remains unlikely. If we’re right and the current government doesn’t fall, sterling should eventually rally.


In China, growth has also slowed, explaining part of the weakness in global exports, with Chinese imports having slowed from 37% year-on-year growth in January to 3% in November. Following a clampdown on lending from the shadow banking sector, Chinese money supply growth has slowed, coinciding with a slowdown in the pace of retail sales growth and industrial production. In response to this slowdown, China is seeking to stimulate the economy with a combination of monetary and fiscal measures, particularly in the face of external headwinds emanating from the ongoing trade dispute with the US. With the potential for either a deal or further escalation in the trade negotiations, there are two-way risks for investors.

Exhibit 3: Fixed income sector returns in local currency

Source: Barclays, BofA/Merrill Lynch, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. IL: Barclays Global Inflation-Linked; Euro Treas: Barclays Euro Aggregate Government – Treasury; US Treas: Barclays US Aggregate Government – Treasury; Global IG: Barclays Global Aggregate – Corporates; US HY: BofA/Merrill Lynch US HY Constrained; Euro HY: BofA/Merrill Lynch Euro Non-Financial HY Constrained; EM Debt: J.P. Morgan EMBIG. All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 December 2018.

Credit markets have struggled this quarter. Non-financial corporate debt-to-GDP has risen to the highest level in over 70 years and the credit quality of the US investment grade index has deteriorated. Given liquidity is much lower than it was before the financial crisis, a wave of downgrades could put further stress on credit markets. There are also concerns about the covenant quality in the leveraged loan market and subprime debt in the auto loan market. Against this backdrop fixed income investors need to be selective.

The oil price plunged this quarter as rising supply, led by US shale production, caught up with demand. Fears around the outlook for global growth and hence demand for oil have also weighed on the price. Falling oil prices create both winners and losers. Oil producers will be hurt and business investment in the energy sector will fall. However, oil consumers—both households and many businesses—will benefit from lower energy costs, providing a potential upside surprise to the currently gloomy mood in markets.

Overall, the risks are probably higher now than they have been at any point since the eurozone crisis. But there are risks both to the downside and the upside. Things that could potentially help the global economy in 2019 include Chinese stimulus, avoidance of a no-deal Brexit, a potential trade deal between the US and China and lower oil prices boosting growth and slowing the pace of interest rate rises.

On the downside, Europe could have a recession, potentially restarting concerns about the sustainability of European sovereign debt. US growth is likely to slow and a recession in late 2019 or 2020 can’t be ruled out. Trade tensions could escalate and British politicians may fail to provide a near-term Brexit solution. Lower oil prices, higher US interest rates and slowing growth could also cause trouble in some of the emerging markets. High leverage in credit markets is a risk, particularly with central banks reducing global liquidity and low dealer inventories reducing trading liquidity. The housing sector in several smaller economies also looks vulnerable heading into 2019.

Exhibit 4: Fixed income government bond returns in local currency

Source: FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. All indices are J.P. Morgan GBIs (Government Bond Indices). All indices are total return in local currency. Data as of 31 December 2018.

There are always risks, but at the moment the risks seem greater than usual. Although there are risks in both directions, at the late stage of the economic cycle, they are currently probably more skewed to the downside. In September, we started thinking that a balanced portfolio was more appropriate than had been the case for most of the last nine years as detailed in our publications “Turning the dial: Portfolio considerations in the late cycle” and “The dial, in detail”. Heading into 2019, a balanced portfolio that avoids big asset allocation bets relative to benchmarks, in either direction, still seems prudent.

Within equities we think there are risks to being overweight small cap, growth and low quality stocks. Within fixed income, longer-term US government bonds could act as a balance to equity exposures but overweights to credit seem risky and credit investors will need to be selective. Given some of the risks in parts of the fixed income market, investors may also want to consider alternative, targeted absolute return strategies, with the ability to hedge equity markets without relying solely on fixed income to reduce risk.

Equities, and other risky assets, have delivered strong returns over the past nine years. Our focus in the near-term is locking in those returns with a more balanced portfolio. While volatility is painful, we know that eventually it creates opportunities. When that time comes it is important to have some dry powder.

Exhibit 5: Index returns in December 2018 (%)

Source: MSCI, FactSet, J.P. Morgan Economic Research, J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Data as of 31 December 2018.


Related products

JPM Global Macro Opportunities FundLeveraging global macro themes to generate performance. This fund targets positive returns in various market conditions by capitalising on the opportunities created by economic trends within a risk-controlled framework.Find out more  JPM Unconstrained Bond Fund

With a focus on mitigating downside risk, this fund targets attractive risk-adjusted returns across different market environments by investing flexibly across global fixed income markets.Find out more  JPM US Equity Income FundThe fund focuses on high-quality US companies with healthy and sustainable dividends, providing lower volatility access to US stock market growth.Find out more  

Important information

This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields is not a reliable indicator of current and future results.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. This communication is issued in the United Kingdom by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, Registered in England No. 01161446. Registered address: 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP.

Our other brands